CETM30 Cybersecurity Fundamentals

Assignment 1 of 2 50% of the summative value of the module

 

Students will undertake a research project critically discussing the principles and procedures associated with cybersecurity. The report and Infograph will give students the opportunity to examine the range of potential threats, risks and attacks identified from the scenarios and indicate how implementation of secure systems can mitigate against the security issues identified.

The following learning outcomes will be assessed:

1.            Ability to critically understand the principles of cybersecurity and the procedures to manage these in a organisational settings, taking into account potential security threats, risks and attacks

2.            Ability to evaluate the processes, procedures and protocols required to implement secure, reliable and effective systems security and identify suitable metrics to quantify and measure levels of security

 

Important Information

 

You are required to submit your work within the bounds of the University Infringement of Assessment Regulations (see your Programme Guide).

 

For this assessment you are asked to submit an individual piece of work, therefore the work must be entirely your own.

 

Referencing for this assessment should be done using the Harvard referencing system. (see your Programme Guide).

 

Submission Date and Time

Report and Infograph on Friday 22nd November by 23.59

Submission Location

via Canvas

Feedback due week beginning 9th December 2019

 

Presentation of Infographs and Peer Assessment to take place on Tuesday 10th December 2019 in the Level 2 Gallery.

 

Assignment Specification

 

Part 1 (50 marks)

 

The cybersecurity environment is a wide and complex one. For the first part of this assignment you are required to produce an Infograph (1 page) outlining a cybersecurity subject area of interest you and focus on the typical threats that either a) individuals in society or b) organisations face from your chosen topic area. The design of your Infograph and the content of the Infograph is left to you to decide but you should consider visual impact, key messages, data to support, examples and underpinning research.

 

It is suggested that you make use of the Infographics tool available at the url below

 

https://www.canva.com/create/infographics/

 

You are not restricted to using this tool and you can make use of any similar tool you wish.

 

Part 2 (50 marks)

 

The second part of the assessment is a commentary on the Infograph discussing the rationale for the subject you have chosen, why it is important (please refer to the literature to support your argument), what the key cybersecurity / threat issues are and how your Infographic illustrates these. You should include any professional or ethical concerns and issues in your commentary. You should include detail on your target audience and what message you are trying to get to the target audience.

 

Your report (maximum 2000 words) should include the following sections:

 

·         Introduction

·         Rationale for Subject Choice

·         Target Audience

·         Importance of Issue to Cybersecurity key issues

·         Impact on Society critical discussion of the threats to either individuals in society or to organisations

·         Professional and ethical issues

·         Conclusions

·         References

 

The following pages show the marking grid that will be used to mark your assessment.

 

CETM30 Assignment 1 Feedback Sheet - 2019

STUDENT NAME:

SAMPLE MARKING SHEET

Infograph____ /40

Excellent visual impact

Good visual impact

Reasonable visual impact

Inadequate visual impact

No visual impace

Marks out of 10

 

 

 

 

Excellent clarity of message

Good clarity of message

Adequate clarity of message

Poor clarity of message

No apparent message to

convey

Marks out of 10

 

 

 

 

Excellent level of detail to support the key messages

Good level of detail to support key messages

Adequate level of detail

Poor level of detail

No detail to support message

Marks out of 10

 

 

 

 

Excellent evidence of research in the selection of Infograph

material

Good evidence of research using in selection of material

Adequate level of research in selection of material

Poor evidence of research aiding selection.

No research evident for material selection

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Excellent set of relevant examples to support Infograph

message

Good set of relevant examples.

Adequate set of examples

Very few examples given

No examples given to support message

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Peer Assessment Mark for Infograph:____ /10

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

No Infograph to judge

Marks out of 10

 

 

 

 

 

Commentary Report for Infograph____ /50

Excellent Introduction

Good introduction

Adequate introduction

Poor introduction

No introduction

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Excellent rationale for subject

choice

Good rationale for subject

choice

Reasonable rationale for

subject choice

Poor rationale

No rationale for subject choice

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Excellently defined target audience.

Very well defined target audience.

Reasonably defined target audience.

Unclearly defined target audience.

No target audience defined.

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Excellent discussion on the importance of cybersecurity

issues

Good discussion

Reasonable discussion

Poor discussion

No discussion

Marks out of 10

 

 

 

 

Excellent account of the impact on society.

Good account of the impact on society

Reasonable account

Poor account.

Impact not discussed

Marks out of 10

 

 

 

 

Excellent discussion on

professional and ethical issues

Good discussion

Reasonable discussion

Poor discussion

No discussion of professional

and ethical issues

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Excellent conclusions

Good conclusions

Reasonable conclusions

Poor conclusions

No conclusions

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

Excellent referencing and citations correctly applied

Good referencing and citations for the most part correctly

applied

Reasonable referencing and citations

Poor referencing and citations

No references or citations

Marks out of 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINAL MARK:

 

%

 

Additional Comments: